The Company You Keep

Gnomes' three phase business plan

Gnomes’ three phase business plan (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Reflections on

What Rich People Know & Desperately Want to Keep a Secret

(Brian Sher, 1999, Macmillan Australia, Sydney)

I am terrible at business. I am not unintelligent, nor am I not hard-working or unskilled. I know how to plan and execute. Yet I find myself always on the brink of financial ruin. Some of this is because my philanthropic heart tends to let me get away with giving myself away. After all, Jesus told us to love our neighbor as ourself. However, part of loving ourselves is being wealthy enough to avoid consuming ourselves with worry. And part of loving our neighbors is being self-sufficient enough to avoid having to be a drain on others. Every time the banker has to remind me of my delinquancies, I am a burden on the banker. After all, he has staked a small part of his reputation and his company’s assests on me. If I fail, he fails, the bank fails, and it does nothing good for my standing in the community. How am I supposed to show others how to be successful if I can’t even succeed myself?

In the past, I often considered that loving myself meant saving money and keeping 100% of profits by doing everything myself. However, especially recently, I have begun to understand for real what my intellect has been telling me for years: there is, in sharing the task, the opportunity to increase efficiency for all involved.    (Often, this means that I should hire professionals to do the things I can do but not do efficiently.  If it takes me a week to do what a professional could do in a day, then I would be better off letting the professional do it.  I can then focus on what I do well and earn more than enough to pay the professional, without all the sleepless nights of research to discover how to do the job and more time wasted troubleshooting the result.  In other words, do-it-yourself may be a necessity in a remote mountain dwelling, but, for the rest of us, it’s just not very efficient.)

As true as this statement is, it is also true that there are two great opponents of said truth at work. The first is one over which one seems to have little control—government regulations. However, even this tangle of economic frustration can be used to ones advantage, assuming that one has enough knowledge of the rules. After all, most of these rules were put into place as protectionist policies at the behest of one or more large corporations seeking to increase their advantage over new competition and ideas. For this reason, one may be sure that there are loopholes that these companies try to exploit to the disadvantage of all others. If you look hard enough and plan your organization to fit these loopholes, you can at least have equal legal footing with the big boys. This doesn’t discount having a really good business plan and executing, but success depends more upon this than anything else. So it does not good to complain about the bureaucratic game. Might as well just learn how to play it.

The second, equally large opponent to success in business, assuming that you have decided to go outside of your limited self, is the fact that it is very difficult to find other people who can both catch your vision and have the business abilities that you require.

In his book, Sher identifies four assests that determine the success of a business:

  1. Your knowledge
  2. Your marketing
  3. Your people
  4. Your systems

For my part, I excell at knowledge. My marketing and systems are good, but I implement them poorly for lack of time. Consequently, I need people to help me with those.

Over the last couple of years, I have tried to surround myself with good people who will able to share my vision and create a corporation that can help all of us reach our goals. Unfortunately, I have also been in the recovery business. I have been dealing with people who should be highly motivated to throw in their lot with me, so that we can all rise together. But, the recovery business is filled with losers and scam artists.

To be sure, I have found a few people who have some kind of vision. However, most of them lack the required education to implement the vision. Most people in recovery are those who copped out of life a long time ago. They, therefore, have no understanding of the effort it takes to be successful. Since, if you want to really make your business a success, you have to surround yourself with successful people, what do you do if all you can afford are life’s losers?

First of all, I had to recognize that the buck still stops with me. It’s incumbent upon me to be successful enough by myself to provide for my own financial survival. I can never put that into someone else’s hands.

Secondly, as the saying goes, if life give’s you lemons, you make lemonaid. When dealing with losers, one must first be able to determine if they are foolish or merely ignorant. The difference is not always easy to discover. Ignorance can be fixed with education. Foolishness is a spiritual condition that cannot be fixed from the outside. It is possible that foolish people may one day wake up, realize they are foolish, and change. But, until that day, they are absolutely useless.

What I discovered is that I was too willing to bet on foolish people. I was too willing to waste valuable time and energy that could have been better spent on the merely ignorant. It is true that education has the ability to change the foolish as well. But, as I said before, you cannot educate a fool until he realizes his folly. In recovery terms, they have to hit rock bottom before they will be ready to accept that they need help. Oftentimes, by that point, brain damage is hard to overcome. God bless them and look after them. If I can find some menial task to help them, I will. But, I am trying to build a business, not running a charity.

The prospects for me are looking much better, now. I am still surrounded by society’s outcasts. But, all of them have three very important things in common: a desire to build each other up, an understanding of the vision, and a voracious yearning for knowledge. In the end, I will still have helped the less fortunate. But, instead of giving them fish, we are all going out fishing together. It’s a lot easier to catch a lot of fish than fishing separately. Instead of throwing in one line and catching one fish at a time, now I have one person to row, one to stear, and two others to help me cast large nets for large schools of fish. Kinda reminds me of what Solomon said long ago, that two people have a better return for their labor, and that a cord of three strands is not quickly broken. One just has to remember every strand in the cord has to be committed to pulling together, and that one rotten strand is likely to cause the others to rot as well.

In short, then, knowledge is your greatest asset. You must do everything you can to know as much as you can. But, your business knowledge base can be greatly expanded by the knowledge of others. Therefore, the people with whom you surround yourself can be more important to your success than even yourself. It is better to share the wealth than to hoard the poverty. If I make $100 and keep 100% for myself, then I have $100. If I make $1000 and share it with four other people, then I have $200. Plus, four other people who could have made $100 on their own have doubled their incomes. Everyone wins! Of course, when five people work together, the government steps in and takes the extra $100 from each person “for their own protection.” So, in reality, the group must be much more efficient to see any kind of gain. This is accomplished with marketing and efficient systems. The advantage of the group is ability to cover that little extra ground that is often beyond the abilities of one man. Division of labor assures that every asset is exploited to the fullest.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Economics/ Book Reviews

Staying Focused: Education is facts, not feeling

When I started my blog nearly one year ago, I had the goal of educating my readers on all things right wing.  Over time, as I began to be influenced by more and more other blog sights, I found myself being sucked into the abyss of desperation and despair about the tack of our country.  As I look over a few of my more recent posts, I sense my personal feelings being reflected in my writing.  This cannot be.

Am I passionate about certain subjects?  Yes!   I abhor abortion, pornography, the breakdown of the family unit, the losses of American freedoms, the destruction of the constitution.  Even as I do all of those things, though, I sense that I am, like all others, often at odds with my very own beliefs.  In other words, I have weaknesses.  Many times, even when I know what’s right, I do something else.  I know I shouldn’t drink soft drinks, because, in the long run, they will adversely affect my health.  But I am addicted to Cola.  I know I shouldn’t drink tap water because of the chlorine and fluoride.  I know I should filter my shower water, too.  But, it’s time-consuming and expensive to do what’s right all the time, and I am getting older and lazier.

Who wants to think about doing the right thing all the time, especially in a society that has chosen to promote exactly the opposite?  It gets frustrating to be that shrill voice in the background barking out the awful truth, the wet blanket spoiling everyone’s fun.  Nobody wants to be told they are wrong.  Nobody wants to see the long-term consequences of the bread and circuses.  By nature, the more I scream at someone to change, the more likely they are to hold on tightly to their mantel of beliefs and run from my chilling winds of advice.

The fascist/progressive movement always talked about the third way.  There was capitalism, which was regarded a greedy free-for-all of the rich exploiting the poor.  There was communism, which was an attempt to link people of the proletariat class around the world into a fight against the bourgeoisie, an eternal fight against capitalism and the nationalism that supports it.  Then along came progressives with the third way–destroy capitalism, but create a strong nationalist collective spirit.  This spirit flew in the face of the great independent fervor of this nation.  So, first a comprehensive indoctrination program had to be established by which the masses could be slowly brainwashed into giving up their individuality and assimilated into the collective way of thinking.  Ever since the strong capitalist backlash under Calvin Coolidge, the progressive forces continued unabated with their takeover of media and education outlets up to the present time when they are in firm control.

We the believers in individualism and free enterprise, are the new radicals, as the communists and progressives once were.  The progressives had the advantage of being able to walk the middle line saying things that appealed to people from both sides, such as, “proud to be American”, “we’re all in this together”, “the rich need to pay their fair share”, “we need to show our compassion for the less fortunate”.  Rhetoric was used to hide their true agenda until the indoctrination was complete and they held the power.  We will not have that advantage.

The only advantage we have is the truth of history.  Historical truth, though, is no longer available through the education system.  Historical truth will not mean anything to those who are following the “savior” to the promised utopia.  But, later, when the reality of the progressive state becomes evident through experience, historical truth will point the way back.

So, this is our goal now–education.  We must keep our heads and hearts firmly in check, so as not to lose either.  In the grand scheme of things, the world is not much changed from millenia that preceded.  The sun still shines in the morning.  The clouds eventually break so that we can see it.  The grass still grows.  War is still the rule more than the exception.  Injustice rears its ugly head wherever we look, and voices of truth and good still struggle against it.  The world is in a constant state of revolution and counter-revolution.  It is the ages-old story of humankind.  The goal of the truth tellers is not different now than it has been from the beginning.  It is only that we have now become the third way.

None of us should think that the goal is the see our words headed in our lifetime.  We should not believe that the pendulum will swing in our direction any faster than it swung in the other.  Maybe, fifty or a hundred years from now, our “radical” advice will move a new generation to see differently than their parents and grandparents.  Then we will be the new Locke and Hobbes.   A new group of 60′s radicals (2060′s, perhaps?) will trumpet the novel cause of free market economics.  Perhaps they will follow in the footsteps of the then new Chinese Republic, adhering to the gold standard and open market principles.  Who knows?  Perhaps it will be Iran that comes of age and rises to lead the new charge to freedom.  In any case, we labor not for ourselves, but for our children’s children.

The Bible tells us that the truth will set us free.  But very few who learned the truth of the Gospel were ever free from persecution.  Only in this great experiment of America, some 1800 years later, was there any political expression of spiritual freedom.  As the twilight closes in on the experiment, the truth still remains that we are free in spirit.  Even if they take our guns, our computers, and our physical freedoms, we are still free in our minds.  The only thing that can imprison our spirits is ourselves.  As long as we don’t allow that, then we shall continue to live free and overcome.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Open Mind

Ignorance is, well, ignorance

Русский: скромная одежда для muslims и non-muslims

Русский: скромная одежда для muslims и non-muslims (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I found this link today on Muslim beards, stereotyping, and proper hijab.  For those of you who don’t know (as I didn’t), hijab is the term used from dress and hair codes that help a Muslim maintain standards of modesty.  In the article, the author debates whether there is a standard for hijab and whether that standard is dictated by Allah or by a human agenda.

In our culture, we have been trained to believe one of two extremes.  The first is that all Muslims would just as soon slit our throats as look at us, that all they want is to force the whole world to be Muslim.  The other is that all Muslims are peace-loving people, and they just want to fit in and be left alone.

What I found interesting in the article is that devout Muslims suffer from the same problems as those of other devout believers in other faiths.  Whenever the fallible human injects his (or her) own agenda into the study of sacred writings, it is inevitable that divisions and contradictions will arise.  Religion becomes more about rules and less about motivation, which causes a whole host of misunderstanding.

In the Christian Bible, St. Paul tells us that women should have their heads covered in the church assembly, because “a woman’s hair is her glory.”  It took me years to understand what was actually being said by Paul.  But, what it boils down to is modesty.  A woman should not dress in a way that distracts attention from the worship.

I read a good article by a woman who felt very self-conscious as a teen because her family took this very seriously and imposed a rather strict dress code.  The upshot for her was that is caused her to feel ashamed of her body, and she found herself becoming anti-social.  All the pressure was put on her not to entice boys to lust after her.  In her article, she makes the valid point that, after a certain point, the lust of men is the issue of the men.  She concluded that modesty didn’t mean removing her femininity, it meant no sticking out in a way that would draw attention.

I assume that St. Paul didn’t tell men to cover their heads because they are not the cornerstone of male attractiveness.  I also assume that this is the reason that the Bible did say that it’s detestable for a man to have hair like a woman–because it would draw undo attention and distract people.  So, modesty is the issue.

The point is this:  it’s easy to take pot shots at people for how they dress or act without really understanding why they are doing it.  It’s also easy to look at rules and guidelines of religious codes and misunderstand the message that they convey.  With the inevitable collision of Muslim and Christian cultures around the world with the ever-growing ignorance of both cultures in the mainstream, we are bound to see an escalation of misunderstanding, mistrust and hatred.  Seems to me that the first step to solving our clashes is to at least understand something about which we talk.

8 Comments

Filed under Open Mind

Circles! Circles! Lots of Circles!

English: A simple binary tree diagram illustra...

English: A simple binary tree diagram illustrating the hierarchical structure of a multi-level marketing compensation plan. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Anyone who has ever been in a MLM (Multi-Level Marketing) business understands the importance of circles.  Circles are your revenue streams.  You begin with your own circle, to which you add downlines–people you recruit into the business.  You make a percentage from their business.  You down lines then go out and recruit their own downlines, which become part of their circle of revenue, but also part of yours.  You downlines’ downlines then make their own circles, and so on, and so on, AND SO ON, AND SO ON…..!  It’s just so exciting!

One thing that is always stressed to people in an MLM is that it’s not a pyramid scheme because any downline can make enough of his or her own circles to become bigger than the upline.  In fact, any low person could conceivably become bigger than even the guy who created the first circle ever!   The fact that this never happens is irrelevant, because it could.

Lately, I have been trolling a lot of sites who trumpet conservatism.  What I discover is that there are a lot of people like me out there–people who are following other people who have a lot of downlines (followers).  It’s clear from reading posts that many smaller fish (like me) like to share the limelight with the big fish (re-blog).  I will agree that I like reading what others are writing to gain new insights and also to garner ideas for jumping off into my own posts.  And, there is a certain economy of effort in re-blogging, not having to re-invent the wheel all the time when some other article expresses “my feelings exactly”.

I also tend to believe that circles come into play here.  The more sites I follow, the more exposure I get.  As I move up to bigger and bigger sites and become recognized, I also begin to grow by osmosis.  Eventually, maybe I’ll be spotted by some really big fish and be asked to come on board.  Then, maybe readers will like me so much that I’ll actually become bigger than the bigs, and everyone will want to be in my circle!  It’s so exciting!

It’s hard to know everything about everything.  That’s why the really big fish “have people for that.”  In other words, staffs can coordinate the division of labor to cover all things well and efficiently.  We small fish don’t have that luxury.  But there is a role for us to play in being re-bloggers, commenters and ping boards.  Small fish are the downlines that help direct people to the best uplines.  We are also the ones who keep the uplines in business.  So, maybe we never become a fat cat.  But we help the collective, which is really the point in grassroots politics, isn’t it?  And, if we have enough talent and perseverance, we’ll get noticed.  The point is to all grow together, so that everyone wins, and not grow at the expense of others.  As hard as it seems at times, we have to balance the tendency to ride on the bandwagon of others with the ability to make a unique contribution to the discussion.

3 Comments

Filed under Open Mind

The Calm Before The Jihadi Storm, 'Why Are American Politicians Not Blowing The Whistle On Obama’s Suicidal Policies?'

Reblogged from MidnightWatcher's Blogspot:

Click to visit the original post

By Raymond Ibrahim - "On this Memorial Day, it’s important to remember that the very same U.S. policies that created al-Qaeda in Afghanistan in the 1980s—leading to the horrific attacks of 9/11—are today allowing al-Qaeda to metastasize all around the Muslim world.  As in the 80s, these new terrorist cells are quietly gathering strength now, and are sure to deliver future terror strikes that will make 9/11 seem like child’s play.

Read more… 867 more words

As I have said before, take down the straw man and give jihad nothing to justify it. Stop meddling with other countries, as it always comes back to bite us in ways we can't see now (although a lot of smart people can).

Leave a Comment

Filed under Law and Politics

Feds Attempt To Defend The Indefensible ... Their New Speech Code "Blueprint"

Reblogged from YouViewed/Editorial:

Facing National Criticism, Feds Attempt to Defend Controversial Campus 'Blueprint'

" Following two weeks of blistering criticism from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) and commentators nationwide, the United States Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is attempting to defend a controversial speech code "blueprint" that requires colleges and universities to expand their definition of sexual harassment to include speech protected by the First Amendment. 

Read more… 131 more words

I haven't checked out FIRE, but it sounds like something that all people interested in true education would want to check out. I will attempt to find out more and update this blog with more links.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Open Mind

Obama and the False Dilemma

Cover of "Introduction to Logic"

Cover of Introduction to Logic

Aaron Ross Powel makes a good point about how the false dilemma is used to put down libertarian principles.  But, the false dilemma is used much more widely  to dupe an illogical public.

Take, for instance, the sequester.  We all know that there is about 40% of government that could easily be trimmed without affecting a single person’s welfare or entitlements.  Yet, when speaking of the sequester, Obama offered us a choice of A – approving more spending or B – cutting someones pay or benefits.

Obama attacked Mitt Romney with a false dilemma.  Either elect me or elect a guy who only cares for his rich friends.  This was false for two reasons.  First, as Obama even said in the debates, Obama is also a one-percent-er.  So, voting for Obama was a sure way to vote for someone who only cares for his rich friends.  But, more importantly, it precluded the possibility that Mitt Romney  might actually care for his country.

Another false dilemma:  Either we extent unemployment or we let people starve.  The falacy here is that the clear third choice would be to stop propping up the broken economic status quo so that the private sector could right itself and start creating new jobs for the unemployed.   But, you’d have to know the truth about FDR’s failed policies, on which Obama doubled down, to even have an understanding that the third option existed.

False dilemmas raise their heads every day in out lives, and failure to think beyond choice one and two is what dooms many of us to the thought that situations are hopeless.  It’s good to learn to think outside the box.  A lot of times, it’s good to get  someone else’s perspective on something before jumping to a conclusion.  There are professionals out there willing to help us plan our finances, fix our marriages, remodel our homes, and all kinds of things where we might struggle to see another way.  There are also these same people when it comes to understanding politics (the land of false dilemmas).  Usually, you aren’t going to find these people on Fox or MSNBC.  You’ll have to shop around a little.  Mostly, you’ll have to get an understanding of what is logical and illogical.  May I suggest Introduction to Logic, by Irving M. Copi.  It’s been around a long time.  It was my textbook in college back in the last millennium a ways.  There are other good titles on that link, I’m sure.  Since you can get a used copy for less than $10 with shipping, it’s pobably within your education budget.  Of course, it will present you will a false dilemma.  “Do I get a book on logic or do I buy two  Starbucks lattes?”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Law and Politics, Open Mind, Science Nuts & Bolts